So I've been running the amounts for Azure and RackSpace Cloud Servers and located that RackSpace is substantially cheaper, less developer investment (no custom programming), and RackSpace offers RackSpace Cloud Files prefer a substantial storage solution for the site. It almost appears too good to be real, what am I missing?

I am unsure precisely what you are asking here, but one key difference is the fact that Azure includes a much bigger infrastructure and support for servers in 21 nations, by having an additional 21 slated this season, whereas RackSpace Cloud has only servers in america using the United kingdom slated for later this season.

Apart from that, if you are just searching for some cheap scalable hosting then you are most likely not missing much by choosing something similar to RackSpace. But Azure is in addition to that.

You will find also numerous additional services readily available for integration with Azure, for example CRM, SharePoint, SQL Azure, Live. In addition to a quantity of development APIs and services, and AppFabric for ineroperability. For developing scalable enterprise programs they are not really comparable.

I have used RackSpace cloud instead of Amazon . com because for small instances RS is less costly. The service continues to be reliable.

Why is Rackspace cheaper? that's only when you'll need Website hosting. Adding a SQL Server database for your cloud server adds $500 for your fee every month (72cents/hour)

I'm really looking for which is much better, too. However I believe I'll opt for Azure, since it features a $109 plan including SQL Azure )

You have to evaluate the application and find out which cloud computing / storage platform would be the best fit for this. Rackspace includes a very handy API which you can use to manage your cloud, which might be but does not need to be a determining factor. Rackspace has persistent instances, meaning it's not necessary to worry a lot about instance crashes and it's not necessary to engineer a custom solution as if you have related to Amazon . com AWS. The Amazon . com advantage may be the richness on the custom services, but when you choose to rely on them, you'll be locked to their infrastructure. It's similar factor with Home windows Azure. This really is being addressed through the OpenStack project. Seek information, the cost lists don't tell the entire story.