I've got a classifieds site and I wish to know whether creating subdomains or sub-folders is much better, like me in condition of confusion.
If we have to take sub-domain names then do you know the benefits which we are able to get from sub-domain names?
If we have to take sub-folders then do you know the benefits we are able to get from their store?
As we create sub-domain names then Google views sub-domain names as individual domain names and would show only 2 results per page.
So please obvious my doubts and tell me which is much better.
Search engines like google will treat subdomains a lot more like separate domain names, therefore it many cases using sub-folders is what you want, to ensure that you aren't distributing you to ultimately thin.
using both is an awful idea, as search engines like google will attempt to index both, and something can get flagged as duplicate content.
Here's articles from SEOMoz explaining it in greater detail: http://world wide web.seomoz.org/blog/understanding-root-domain names-subdomains-versus-subfolders-microsites
It is dependent on which content you need to create subfolder/-domain names for.
Could it be associated with your original site? Then you definitely should certainly use sub-folder because this goes towards the same domain. It's far better for that backlinks to spread if you are using sub folders.
For the PageRank, it's easier to use subfolders.
Subdomains is recognized as a brand new site. Subfolders isn't, and can improve ratings in case your original website is effective.
You should use both subdomains and subfolders if you want, bear in mind to make use of the canonical-tag to prevent duplicate content.
Two relevant links that describes this:
http://world wide web.searchmarketingstandard.com/when-to-use-subdomains-versus-subfolders http://world wide web.searchenginejournal.com/subdomains-or-subfolders-which-are-better-for-search engine optimization/6849/
Personally, Time passes from the logic that the subdomain is really a different application / site possessed through the same company. A subfolder is area of the same application / site.
It's most likely better for the PageRank / internet search engine entries for those who have 'one-large-site', instead of many different loosely combined domain names. When the content from the sites is noticeably different, e.g. an individual site may have a gallery or blog subdomain which will keep this content noticeably seperate in the primary site - it most likely is sensible for any subdomain, otherwise, I'd stay with folders.
p.s. Side note, dunno if this sounds like important, but web-browsers only open two connections at the same time to some website when installing the various files that constitute a webpage. So there's grounds for any subdomain in cases like this where it positively accelerates (though, on the fast site, minimally) the page load time.
Why don't you both? Have demandb.com/foo and foo.demandb.com visit the same place.
Technically, a subdomain is really a different server. The organization Sometimes for includes a domain with several subdomains where every subdomain is situated on the different (virtual or real) computer/server. This way, if one of these crashes, the relaxation just keeps running.
From the developer's perspective, a subdomain would pressure everything inside the subdomain to become a different application during a subfolder, the subfolder and subsubfolders could participate the applying within the root folder. After I create web programs, individuals web programs are frequently examined first on the test server inside a subfolder. After they pull through the tests, they're gone to live in the main that belongs to them subdomain.
When two subfolders are based on each other, they are frequently area of the same application, thus it might be better to ensure that they're in their own individual subfolder to allow them to share snacks and periods easier.
- Use sub folders if you want SSL- then you definitely just have 1 fundamental certificate for that root
- If you are using both, make certain you redirect 301 to each other. Which will steer clear of the internet search engine duplication problem, but would be problematic for SSL in a few instances.